Judge Kaplan Rejects Justice Department's Attempt to Intervene on Trump's Behalf in Defamation Suit

In an opinion Tuesday, Judge Kaplan denied the Justice Department's motion to substitute the United States for Donald Trump as the defendant in a defamation suit against the president in his individual capacity. The plaintiff, E. Jean Carroll, published a book excerpt in 2019 alleging that Trump raped her in the mid-1990s. Trump told the press that Carroll made the story up, and Carroll sued him for defamation. The Justice Department intervened, arguing that the lawsuit was really one against the United States because Carroll had sued an "employee" of the United States for actions within the scope of his employment. Judge Kaplan held that the president is a constitutional officer rather than a government "employee," and that the allegedly defamatory statements were not made within the scope of his employment because, as the chief executive of the United States government, no one else has the power to control his conduct: "To hold that someone else exercises control over the president would turn the Constitution on its head." On this point, Judge Kaplan continued:

The President of the United States wields the entire executive power of the federal government. Each day, he or she makes decisions that affect the lives of hundreds of millions of Americans in countless ways. ... As noted above, “there is no liability for the conduct of one who . . . is doing work as to which there is no control or right to control by the master.” Such control is absent whenever the president discharges his duties. And it is non-existent when the president exercises his “extraordinary power to speak to his fellow citizens” by addressing the press. No one gives him permission to speak. No one can require him to say, or not to say, anything at all. No one has the authority to cut him off. And the statements he makes, as well as the topics he discusses, are entirely of his own choosing. These points are clearer still on the facts of this case. No one even arguably directed or controlled President Trump when he commented on the plaintiff’s accusation, which had nothing to do with the official business of government, that he raped her decades before he took office. And no one had the ability to control him.