Overview
The evaluation process of existing[1] active substances is governed by the Review Programme (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014) which, for each active, determines the timeline and Member State competent authority responsible for the evaluation (eCA). The European Commission (Commission) is now seeking to amend that system, by a draft delegated regulation and annex, in preparation for the UK leaving the EU on March 29, 2019 (Brexit). Stakeholders can submit comments on the draft measure until October 11, 2018.
In absence of a transitional agreement between the UK and the remaining EU member states – EU law will cease to apply to and in the UK. It is not certain that such a withdrawal agreement will be concluded in time. In any event, the reallocation of the active substance review responsibilities is necessary because the draft Withdrawal Agreement currently being negotiated provides that the UK’s competent authority (the HSE) may not act as an eCA.
The 18 active substance dossiers (overview of affected active substances at the end of this alert) scheduled for evaluation by the HSE[2] would be reallocated to the Czech Republic (4), Germany (3), Sweden (2), France (2), Italy (2), Poland (2), Austria (1), Hungary (1) and Switzerland (1). The authorities have until December 31, 2020[3] to submit their conclusions and assessment reports to ECHA. Such reallocations will increase the workload of these competent authorities and potentially lead to further interruptions in an already chronically delayed Review Programme. The measure would also allow each new evaluating competent authority to, “[n]otwithstanding the stage of evaluation of the application”[4], request fees for services provided and obliges it to reject any application for which those fees are not paid.[5] One can only hope that no more than a fair proportion of fees will be charged, given that fees will already have been paid to the HSE.
The draft measure is planned to be adopted as a delegated act under Articles 83 and 89(1) of the Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR). The relevant expert group (E03125 – Competent Authorities for Biocidal Products) has been previously consulted and the Commission is currently collecting feedback on the draft measure until October 11, 2018. In view of the potential impacts, companies affected by the reallocation should seriously consider submitting comments. Involvement of legal counsel in the preparation of the comments (potentially highlighting general principles of EU law), could strengthen their impact and effectiveness. Thereafter, the Commission adopts the measure but the European Parliament and Council have 2 months to object. If no objection is raised, the measure enters into force. As per the Interinstitutional register of delegated acts, the planned adoption date is “Q1 2019”, which would be just in time for Brexit.
Preparations in other areas of EU chemical regulation are well underway: Similar reallocations concerning the evaluation of substance under the REACH Regulation already occurred at the beginning of the year. The latest update to the CoRAP indicates that substances which were initially scheduled for evaluation by the UK’s HSE have been assigned to the competent authorities of other Member States.
Overview of active substances foreseen to be reallocated as per Article 6a and Annex of the draft delegated regulation
Substance | EC number |
CAS number |
New eCA |
PTs | Annex II entry |
|
1. | (2R,6aS,12aS)-1,2,6,6a,12,12a-Hexahydro-2-isopropenyl-8,9-dimethoxychromeno[3,4-b]furo[2,3-h]chromen-6-one (Rotenone) | 201-501-9 | 83-79-4 | PL | 17 | 79 |
2. | Symclosene | 201-782-8 | 87-90-1 | DE | 2,3,4,5, 11,12 | 85 |
3. | 3-Phenyl-propen-2-al (Cinnamaldehyde) | 203-213-9 | 104-55-2 | PL | 2 | 113 |
4. | 2-Phenoxyethanol | 204-589-7 | 122-99-6 | IT | 1,2,4,6,13 | 171 |
5. | Potassium dimethyldithiocarbamate | 204-875-1 | 128-03-0 | SE | 9, 11, 12 | 187 |
6. | Sodium dimethyldithiocarbamate | 204-876-7 | 128-04-1 | SE | 9, 11, 12 | 188 |
7. | Monolinuron | 217-129-5 | 1746-81-2 | HU | 2 | 321 |
8. | Troclosene sodium | 220-767-7 | 2893-78-9 | DE | 2,3,4,5,11,12 | 345 |
9. | Sodium dichloroisocyanurate dihydrate |
220-767-7 | 51580-86-0 | DE | 2,3,4,5,11,12 | 346 |
10. |
Monochloramine generated from ammonium sulfate |
FR | 11,12 | 458 | ||
11. | (Benzyloxy)methanol | 238-588-8 | 14548-60-8 | AT | 6, 13 | 531 |
12. | p-[(Diiodomethyl)sulphonyl]toluene | 243-468-3 | 20018-09-1 | CH | 6,7,9,10 | 554 |
13. | 2-Octyl-2H-isothiazol-3-one (OIT) | 247-761-7 | 26530-20-1 | FR | 6,7,9,10,11,13 | 571 |
14. |
S-[(6-Chloro-2-oxooxazolo[4,5-b]pyridin-3(2H)-yl)methyl] O,O-dimethyl thiophosphate (Azamethiphos) |
252-626-0 | 35575-96-3 | IT | 18 | 599 |
15. | 2-Hydroxy-α,α,4-trimethylcyclohexanemethanol | 255-953-7 | 42822-86-6 | CZ | 19 | 609 |
16. | Eucalyptus citriodora oil, hydrated, cyclized |
1245629-80-4 | CZ | 19 | 1045 | |
17. | Cymbopogon winterianus oil, fractionated, hydrated, cyclized |
Not |
Not |
CZ | 19 | 1046 |
18. |
Eucalyptus citriodora oil and citronellal, hydrated, |
Not |
Not |
CZ | 19 | 1047 |
[1] i.e. that were on the EU market on May 14, 2000.[2] Which could be reallocated to any EU-27 based competent authority as well as the authorities of EEA countries (Iceland, Norway, and Lichtenstein) or Switzerland (by virtue of the Mutual Recognition Agreement for BPR between the EU and Switzerland).
[3] Or, if later the timeline foreseen by the Review Programme under Article 6(3)b and Annex III.
[4] Recital 5 of the Draft Measure.
[5] Article 6a(2) of the Draft Measure.