- William F. Abrams
+1 650 687 9501
- Rebecca Edelson
+1 310 734 3213
- Seong Hwan Kim
+1 310 734 3232
Steptoe assists clients to understand the value of their confidential proprietary information, and to protect that information – which can qualify as trade secrets under the law if the requisite steps are taken – so that their businesses can thrive.
Trade secret information can include formulas, manufacturing or business processes, methods of operation, business strategies, customer information, and compilations of information. Information may be protectable as trade secrets even though it is not patented or copyrighted.
In a business environment with increasing employee mobility and the proliferation of start-up companies in the Internet and technology sectors, misappropriation and misappropriation claims are on the rise. We advise clients on how to protect their trade secrets and to recover them and to obtain compensation if they are misappropriated. We also counsel our clients on how to avoid misappropriation claims by others and on defending such claims if they are made.
Our partners have been recognized by their peers for their experience in the field of trade secret protection, through their contributions to the leading treatise, Trade Secret Litigation and Protection in California, published by the State Bar of California. One of our partners edited the treatise. Five of our lawyers are authors of this hand book used by judges, practitioners and businesses across jurisdictions.
We have significant experience advocating for our clients in a variety of forums – in the courtroom, before the International Trade Commission (ITC), or through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) – and we are adept in litigating claims for misappropriation of trade secrets and confidential information, claims related to confidentiality agreements, covenants not to compete, and licenses, and claims under federal statutes which proscribe misappropriation and “hacking” activities such as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and the Electronic Communications Privacy Act.
We also recognize that trade secret disputes are frequently won or lost at a practical level through the outcome of interim injunction proceedings. It is routine for our trade secret litigators to mobilize quickly to prepare injunction applications and respond to them on very short notice, ensuring that our client’s position is effectively presented. Given the breadth of trade secret information (e.g., customer information vs. scientific formulas) and of the contexts in which it is implicated (e.g., a departing employee vs. a joint venture), Steptoe draws from an interdisciplinary group of lawyers within its intellectual property, labor and employment, and litigation practices to assist clients in these substantively varied trade secret matters. We also know how to protect confidential information during litigation, which is becoming an increasingly critical issue these days.
Further, we assist clients in responding to threats to their trade secrets and to claims of misappropriations by others, whether it is inside or outside of litigation.
Our team also has vast experience outside of the litigation arena, including:
- Developing trade secret and confidential know-how protection programs
- Creating employee handbooks, non-competition agreements, confidentiality agreements, non-solicitation agreements, e-mail and privacy policies, and incentive compensation agreements for corporate employees
- Counseling employers on steps to take to avoid receiving trade secrets or confidential information when hiring key employees from competitors
- Conducting trade secret and confidential information audits, either as stand-alone audits or as part of a broader IP audit
- Preparing non-disclosure agreements, confidentiality agreements, and non-compete agreements for prospective merger and acquisition partners, joint venture partners, contractors, vendors, consultants, and professionals
- Licensing trade secret information
- Negotiating with government agencies to prevent them from releasing clients' trade secret information in response to a request made by a member of the public for access
- Drafting outsourcing agreements and technology commercialization agreements with appropriate protections for trade secrets, confidential know-how, and other intellectual property
- Identifying appropriate steps to maintain confidentiality and protect trade secrets and confidential know-how in a digital, networked, or Internet environment
Trade Secrets and Unfair Competition Cases
- SoftWriters, Inc. v. Integra, Inc., et al. (W.D. PA. 2015) – Represented SoftWriters in a trade secret misappropriation action involving issues concerning the healthcare industry. This matter was settled.
- CODA Development s.r.o. et al v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company et al (N.D. Oh. 2015) – Representing CODA Development in a trade secret case against Goodyear relating to self-inflating tire technology.
- Quintel Technology Ltd. v. Huawei Technologies USA, Inc. et. al (E.D. Tex. 15-cv-00307) - Defending Huawei Technologies USA, Inc., Future Wei Technologies, Inc., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., and Zhengxiang Ma. in a trade secrets litigation brought by Quintel relating to antenna technology.
- SanDisk Corp. v. SK Hynix Inc. (Santa Clara County Superior Court and US District Court Northern District of California, 2014) – Steptoe represented SK Hynix, a large memory chipmaker and semiconductor company, in trade secrets litigation against SanDisk. The matter settled favorably.
- Steptoe completed a research project for the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) that culminated in a handbook on trade secret investigations at the International Trade Commission. The handbook provides a business oriented guide for MOFCOM to use in teaching Chinese companies about trade secrets litigation and trade secrets misappropriation. It may also be used by MOFCOM to assist Chinese companies in responding to Section 337 investigations and US federal and state court litigation involving alleged trade secret misappropriation. (2014)
- Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. v. Motorola, Inc. et al. (N.D. Ill., 2011) - Represented Nokia Siemens Networks B.V. and Nokia Siemens US (collectively NSN) in a trade secret action seeking to prevent the $1.2 billion sale of Motorola's wireless networks business to NSN.
- Newport Controls v. Balboa Instruments (C.D. Cal., 2010) – Represented Balboa Instruments in an antitrust action involving the commercialization of spa controllers. The case settled on favorable terms.
- Thomas and Betts Power Solutions, LLC dba JT Packard v. S.R. Bray, LLC dba Power Plus! et al. (W.D. Wis., 2010) - Defeated an attempt by Thomas and Betts Power Solutions, LLC dba JT Packard to obtain a preliminary injunction against its competitor, S.R. Bray, LLC dba Power Plus!, in a trade secret misappropriation case involving the power services industry.
- StarTrak Sys. Inc. v. Satamatics, et al. (D. N.J., 2007) – Defeated motion for preliminary injunction, against Satamatics, following evidentiary hearing in a trade secrets matter involving satellite and software technology.
- SundRy v. Xwave (E.D. Va., 2007) – Defended Xwave in trade secrets case relating to software. Case settled.
- Kirchman Corporation v. Regions Financial Corporation (M.D. Fla., 2006)– Defended Regions in a contract action concerning bank data processing software in which the plaintiff was seeking in excess of $60 million. The action was concluded with a settlement favorable to Regions.
- Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Keegan, 201 Ariz. 344, 35 P.3d 105 (Ct. App., 2001) – Represented a major newspaper, Phoenix Newspapers, Inc., in an action against a developer of a high school graduation aptitude examination that was prohibiting access to or disclosure of the test on the grounds that it contained trade secrets.
- McDonnell Douglas v. NASA, 180 F.3d 303 (D.C. Cir., 1999) – Served as lead counsel for McDonnell Douglas in ground-breaking reverse-FOIA litigation, establishing that line item prices in government contracts can be protected from public disclosure under Exemption 4 and the Trade Secrets Act.
- REM v. Risk Assessment Solutions, et al. – Represented defendants in a case involving trade secrets, contracts, and ownership of intellectual property assets. Plaintiff dismissed actions.
Select News & Events
- The Recorder Quotes Bill Abrams on the Defend Trade Secrets Act
- Daily Journal Favorably Reviews Trade Secret Treatise Co-Edited by Bec Edelson
- Bec Edelson Co-Edits ‘Trade Secret Litigation and Protection in California’
- Steptoe Expands IP Practice in New York with Patent Litigator John Molenda
- “Protection 360,” AIPLA
- Hot Topics in Trade Secret Law, State Bar of California
- Litigating Trade Secrets at the International Trade Commission
- "Trade Secrets of Trade Secrets," 38th Annual IP Institute of the State Bar of California
- "Trade Secret Litigation and Protection in California," Intellectual Property Section of the State Bar of CaliforniaNovember 2014
- English language handbook on trade secret ligation for the Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China’s, 2014
- Trade Secret Litigation and Protection in California Supplement (2011), Intellectual Property Section of the State Bar of California