Widely recognized as one of the world's leading law firms in matters arising under the agreements of the World Trade Organization (WTO), Steptoe represents and advises clients at every stage of dispute settlement. As one of the few law firms in the world that regularly appear on behalf of WTO Members in both panel and Appellate Body proceedings, we have advised WTO Members and private sector interests in more than 50 different WTO dispute settlement proceedings. We work with our clients to develop case strategies, participate in the consultations process, prepare written submissions, and present arguments before panels and the Appellate Body. In recognition of our prominence in this area, Steptoe’s WTO practice has received a top-tier ranking from Chambers Global for more than 15 consecutive years.
Steptoe litigates a wide array of issues relating to the interpretation and application of the WTO Agreements. We have been involved in disputes relating to trade remedies, trade in goods, trade in services, intellectual property rights, and technical barriers to trade, among others. Many of these disputes have resulted in landmark panel and Appellate Body reports interpreting key provisions of the WTO Agreements.
Together with our colleagues in Steptoe's Trade Policy and Investor-State Arbitration Groups, we advise sovereign and commercial clients on how to use international trade and investment agreements to achieve their objectives. Our understanding of WTO disciplines, along with the role that WTO dispute settlement can play in enforcing those disciplines, is an important element of Steptoe's comprehensive approach to addressing market access issues and other barriers to trade and investment faced by our clients.
Our leading WTO practice reflects the firm's decades-long involvement in the field of public international law and treaty-based arbitration. The advice we provide to WTO Member governments is just one example of the work Steptoe does for sovereign governments across a variety of different practice areas.
Noteworthy
Chambers Global
- Chambers Global, International Trade/WTO, Global Market Leaders (2008-2024)
- Chambers Global, International Trade: Export Controls & Economic Sanctions, (The Elite), US (2019-2024)
- Chambers Global, International Trade: Trade Remedies & Trade Policy, US (2020-2024)
- Chambers Global, Disputes, International & Cross-Border Capabilities, US (2019-2024)
- Chambers Global, International Trade: CFIUS Experts, US (2020-2024)
- Chambers Global, International & Cross-Border Disputes (International Firms), China (2021-2024)
- Chambers Global, International Trade/WTO (International Firms), China (2019-2024)
- Chambers Global, International Trade/WTO, Asia-Pacific Region (2019-2024)
- Chambers Global, International Trade/WTO, Europe-wide (2019-2024)
- Chambers Global, International Trade/WTO, Europe/Belgium (2008-2017)
Chambers Asia-Pacific & Greater China Region
- Chambers Greater China Region, Corporate Investigations/Anti-Corruption (International Firms) (2022, 2024)
- Chambers Greater China Region, International Trade/WTO (International Firms) (2022, 2024)
- Chambers Asia-Pacific, International Trade/WTO, Asia-Pacific Region (2009-2025)
Chambers Europe
- Chambers Europe, International Trade/WTO, Europe/Belgium (2008-2023)
Chambers USA
- Chambers USA, International Trade: CFIUS Experts, Nationwide (2017-2025)
- Chambers USA, International Trade: Export Controls & Economic Sanctions: The Elite, Nationwide (2017-2025)
- Chambers USA, International Trade: Trade Remedies & Trade Policy, Nationwide (2017-2025)
- Chambers USA, International Trade, Nationwide (2005-2016)
- Chambers USA, International Arbitration: Enforcement, Nationwide (2022)
Legal 500
- Legal 500 US, Government: Government Contracts (2024-2025)
- Legal 500 US, International Trade: Trade Remedies & Trade Policy (2023-2025)
- Legal 500 US, International Trade: Customs, Export Controls, & Economic Sanctions (2023-2025)
- Legal 500 US, International Trade: CFIUS (2023-2025)
- Legal 500 US, Dispute Resolution: International Trade (2007-2022, 2024)
- Legal 500 US, Dispute Resolution: International Litigation (2025)
- Legal 500 UK, Dispute Resolution: International Arbitration (2010-2025)
- Legal 500 UK, Dispute Resolution: Public International Law (2010-2025)
- Legal 500 EMEA, Customs, Trade, WTO & Anti-Dumping, Belgium (2011-2019, 2023)
Law360
- Law360, International Trade Group of the Year (2010-2013, 2015, 2019)
Global Arbitration Review
- Global Arbitration Review, "International arbitration practice that impressed in the past year," (2016)
- Global Arbitration Review, GAR 100 (2017-2023)
Global Investigations Review
- Global Investigations Review (GIR) 100, Top 30 Firms for Investigations Worldwide (2015-2024)
WorldECR
- WorldECR, Sanctions Law Firm of the Year, USA (2018, 2021), Sanctions Highly Commended Law Firm, USA (2017);
- WorldECR, Export Controls, Law Firm of the Year, USA (2015-2016), Highly Commended Law Firm, USA (2017), Runner-Up Law Firm of the Year, USA (2018)
- WorldECR, Sanctions Law Firm of the Year Runner-Up, Rest of the World (2021)
Asia Legal Business
- ALB China Awards, International Firm of the Year: International Trade (Award in 2021, Shortlisted in 2022-2024)
- ALB China Awards, Regulatory Compliance Law Firm of the Year (Shortlisted 2022-2024)
- ALB Hong Kong Awards, Regulation and Investigations Law Firm of the Year (Shortlisted 2020-2021, 2023)
- ALB Japan Awards, Japan Practice Foreign Law Firm of the Year (Award in 2021, Shortlisted in 2023-2024)
- ALB Korea Awards, Korea Practice Foreign Law Firm of the Year (2022-2023)
China Business Law Journal
- China Business Law Award, International Trade (2013-2025)
- China Business Law Award, Corporate Compliance (2019-2025)
- China Business Law Award, Government and public policy (2022)
- China Business Law Award, Anti-Bribery & Compliance (2015, 2018)
China Law & Practice
-
China Law & Practice, International Firm of the Year: Dispute Resolution, Honorable Mention (2024)
- China Law & Practice, International Firm of the Year: Trade Award (2016, 2018-2020, 2022); Shortlisted (2021)
- China Law & Practice, Shortlisted, International Firm of the Year: Regulatory & Compliance (2018, 2021-2022)
Representative Matters
Steptoe lawyers have been involved in many of the most complex and high-profile WTO disputes since the founding of the WTO in 1995, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) before it. For example:
- Australia — Certain Measures Concerning Trademarks and Other Plain Packaging Requirements Applicable to Tobacco Products and Packaging (DS434, DS435, DS441, DS458, DS467). We represented the Government of Australia in connection with the tobacco plain packaging disputes, which were among the largest and most complex disputes ever to be filed at the WTO. These disputes implicated critically important questions concerning the relationship between measures to protect public health and the trade-related obligations that WTO members have under the WTO Agreements. We helped Australia achieve sweeping victories before the panel and the Appellate Body.
- Argentina – Measures Relating to Trade in Goods and Services (DS453). We represented the Government of Argentina in a case that upheld Argentina's use of defensive tax measures against countries that do not adhere to international standards of tax transparency.
- Brazil – Certain Measures Concerning Taxation and Charges (DS472, DS497). We represented the Government of Brazil in relation to complaints by the European Union and Japan against the principal elements of Brazil's industrial policy. The dispute concerned the relationship between permissible domestic production subsidies and impermissible domestic content requirements under the GATT 1994, the SCM Agreement, and the TRIMs Agreement.
- United States – Countervailing and Anti-dumping Measures on Certain Products from China (DS449). We represented the Government of China in this dispute challenging the consistency of US legislation retroactively authorizing the imposition of countervailing duties on imports from so-called "non-market economies" (including China) with the transparency requirements in Article X of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. China disagreed with the panel's central legal finding, and the Appellate Body reversed this finding, and agreed with the interpretation that was advanced by China.
- United States – Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties (China) (DS379) and United States — Countervailing Duty Measures on Certain Products from China (DS437). We represented the Government of China in these disputes establishing important jurisprudence concerning the interpretation and application of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.
- China – Electronic Payment Services (DS413). We represented the Government of China in the first dispute arising under the General Agreement on Trade in Services relating to trade in financial services.
- Represented the Canadian softwood lumber industry in all aspects of the WTO litigation over the past 20 years relating to trade in softwood lumber between Canada and the United States.
News & Publications
Press Releases
Steptoe Practices and Attorneys Earn High Rankings in the Legal 500 United States 2025
June 11, 2025
Press Releases
Chambers Asia-Pacific 2025 Recognizes Steptoe's Top International Trade Practice and Lawyers
December 18, 2024
Press Releases
Steptoe Announces Partner and Counsel Promotions for January 1, 2025
November 19, 2024
Events
Seminars & Events
Brussels Symposium and Cocktail Reception
November 12, 2024
Speakers: Ruxandra Cana, Eric C. Emerson, Tyler Evans, Anne-Gabrielle Haie, Robert Klotz, Patrick F. Linehan, Eléonore Mullier, Daniel A. Mullen, Darryl Nirenberg, Meredith Rathbone, Jeffrey G. Weiss, Charles Whiddington, Wendy Wysong
Resources
Investor-State Arbitration Series
Investor-State Arbitration and "Fair and Equitable" Treatment
May 19, 2015
Investor-State Arbitration Series
Foreign Investors’ Options to Deal with Regulatory Changes in the Renewable Energy Sector
September 23, 2014
By: Matthew Coleman, Steven K. Davidson, Jeffrey F. Pryce, Thomas Innes
Investor-State Arbitration Series
How to Protect Investments in Russia and Ukraine Through International Arbitration
March 28, 2014