Steptoe is widely recognized as one of the world’s leading law firms in matters arising under the agreements of the World Trade Organization (WTO). In 2018, Steptoe was - for the 11th year - one of only two law firms in the world that received a top-tier ranking from Chambers Global for its WTO practice.
Steptoe has advised WTO Members and private sector interests in more than 50 different WTO dispute settlement proceedings. Steptoe has represented and advised clients at every stage of dispute settlement, and is among the few law firms in the world that regularly appear on behalf of WTO Members in both panel and Appellate Body proceedings. We work with our clients to develop case strategies, participate in the consultations process, prepare written submissions, and present arguments before panels and the Appellate Body.
Steptoe has litigated a wide array of issues relating to the interpretation and application of the WTO Agreements. The WTO disputes in which Steptoe has been involved include disputes relating to trade remedies, trade in goods, trade in services, intellectual property rights, and technical barriers to trade, among others. Many of these disputes have resulted in landmark panel and Appellate Body reports interpreting key provisions of the WTO Agreements.
Together with our colleagues in Steptoe’s Trade Policy and Investor-State Arbitration Groups, we advise sovereign and commercial clients on how to use international trade and investment agreements to achieve their objectives. Our understanding of WTO disciplines, along with the role that WTO dispute settlement can play in enforcing those disciplines, is an important element of Steptoe’s comprehensive approach to addressing market access issues and other barriers to trade and investment faced by our clients.
Steptoe’s leading WTO practice reflects the firm’s decades-long involvement in the field of public international law and treaty-based arbitration. The advice that Steptoe provides to WTO Member governments is just one example of the work that Steptoe does for sovereign governments across a variety of different practice areas.
- Chambers Asia-Pacific, International Trade/WTO, Asia-Pacific Region (2009-2018)
- Chambers Asia-Pacific, International Trade/WTO, China (2011-2018)
- Chambers Global, International Trade/WTO, Global (2008-2018)
- Chambers USA, International Trade: Trade Remedies & Trade Policy, Nationwide (2017-2018)
- Chambers USA, International Trade, Nationwide (2005-2016)
- Legal 500 US, Dispute Resolution: International Trade (2016-2018)
- Legal 500 US, Litigation: International Trade (2007-2015)
- China Law & Practice, International Firm of the Year: Trade (2016, 2018)
- China Business Law Journal, China Business Law Award: International Trade (2014-2018)
- Law360, International Trade Group of the Year (2010-2013, 2015)
Managing Director, International Trade & Investment
Steptoe lawyers have been involved in many of the most complex and high-profile WTO disputes since the founding of the WTO in 1995, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) before it. For example, Steptoe has:
- Argentina – Measures Relating to Trade in Goods and Services (DS453). Represented the Argentinian government in a case that upheld Argentina’s use of defensive tax measures against countries that do not adhere to international standards of tax transparency;
- United States – Anti-Dumping and Countervailing Duties (China) (DS379). Represented the Government of China in a case that established important jurisprudence concerning the interpretation and application of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures;
- China – Electronic Payment Services (DS413). Represented the Government of China in the first dispute arising under the General Agreement on Trade in Services relating to trade in financial services;
- Canada – Measures Relating to Imports of Wheat and Treatment of Imported Grain (DS276). Represented the Canadian Wheat Board and provided assistance to the Government of Canada in the first major dispute concerning state trading enterprises under Article XVII of the GATT 1994;
- United States – “Zeroing” of Dumping Margins (DS294). Represented a major European steel producer, working closely with the European Communities in the successful appeal of this dispute to the Appellate Body;
- Represented the Canadian softwood lumber industry in all aspects of the WTO litigation over the past 20 years relating to trade in softwood lumber between Canada and the United States.
News & Publications
November 30, 2018
June 12, 2018
May 30, 2018
May 30, 2018
April 26, 2018
April 12, 2018
March 8, 2018
March 5, 2018
February 15, 2018
Investor-State Arbitration Series
September 23, 2014